Characterizing internet search patterns for neurologic and neurosurgical conditions following celebrity diagnosis.

Social media and internet platforms have become significant drivers of mass-information. Highly publicized events, such as John McCain's announcement of his glioblastoma diagnosis, often drive national public interest in medical topics. Improved understanding of the temporality of interest spikes as well as the nature of the information that garners attention from outside the medical community can help inform ways in which the medical community can boost awareness of (and interest in) the field of neurosurgery. We utilized the "explore topics" feature on Google Trends to obtain web, news, and YouTube search data from May 1, 2015, to May 1, 2019 for the terms "glioblastoma," "brain tumor," "stroke," and "multiple sclerosis" to identify periods of visibly increased search interest. Search results for "glioblastoma" showed significantly elevated average interest during the period of July 3-23, 2017, as compared to that generated since this specific time period (42.6 vs. 8.73, P<0.001). This increased search activity therefore directly correlated with John McCain's public announcement of his glioblastoma diagnosis, and a similar search interest spike was evident using the search term "brain tumor" (87.3 vs. 64.2, P<0.001). Search results for "multiple sclerosis" showed - as a result of the online buzz created by Selma Blair's battle with the disease - significantly elevated average interest from October 8, 2018, to October 28, 2018, and February 11, 2019, to March 3, 2019, when compared to the average interest of the remaining time (59 vs. 40.16, P<0.001 and 69 vs. 40.16, P<0.001). Finally, there were no corresponding elevations in YouTube search interest for any of the terms associated with increased interest on Google Trends. Following major events related to the neurological disease of public figures there is an expected rise in Google search interest relevant to these topics. Our findings suggest that there is an optimal window of approximately 2 weeks following each of these events for activist and clinical groups to publicize their desired message, and for the field of neurosurgery and neurological science to increase public awareness regarding specific diseases, with a regression to baseline interest by 4 months following the event.

YouTube as a Patient Education Resource for Male Hypogonadism and Testosterone Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: YouTube is an unregulated platform that patients are using to learn about treatment options. AIM: To assess the reliability of YouTube videos (YTVs) related to male hypogonadism and testosterone therapy. METHODS: Searching on YouTube by relevance and view count, we analyzed the top 10 videos (80 videos total) for the following search terms: low testosterone, testosterone replacement therapy, AndroGel, and hypogonadism. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We recorded the number of views for each video, evaluated videos using the DISCERN score (DS) criterion, and compared the DS for videos including board-certified physicians and videos without. A second comparison was made between videos with board-certified physicians in urology, endocrinology, other MD, and those without any physician. RESULTS: The YTVs analyzed received a total of 38,549,090 views, a median of 25,201 and 17.30 views/day. Videos that featured physicians had significantly fewer views/day than videos that did not (39.48 CI 9,72 vs 1,731 CI 330, 3,132; P = .019). Most YTVs studied were unreliable. The median DS across all videos was 2. However, most videos created by physicians were found to be reliable with a median DS of 4. In addition, YTVs that did not feature a physician were found to be significantly less reliable than videos that featured a physician (3.22 CI 3.06, 4.09 vs 1.87 CI 1.56, 2.18; P < .001). There was no significant difference in the reliability or viewership of YTVs stratified by physician type. CONCLUSION: Most YTVs related to male hypogonadism/testosterone therapy were unreliable, but there are reliable YTVs available. Reliable videos usually feature a physician and receive fewer views than unreliable YTVs. Physicians and academic societies should work to provide verified videos to provide patients with reliable information about male hypogonadism and testosterone therapy. CJ Warren, J Wisener, B Ward, et al. YouTube as a Patient Education Resource for Male Hypogonadism and Testosterone Therapy. Sex Med 2021;9:100324.

Reporting of Research by Matched Otolaryngology Residency Applicants.

OBJECTIVES: Matching to an otolaryngology residency program is a competitive process for medical students, and research performed by students is considered as a factor for granting interviews by program directors. Because abstracts, presentations and publications are all reported in combination by the National Resident Matching Program's "Charting Outcomes in the Match" (ChOM) and may be weighted differently by PDs, we specifically investigated the number of publications by past applicants accepted to top otolaryngology residency programs. METHODS: The top 25 otolaryngology residency programs were identified using Doximity, sorting by reputation. Current residents were determined from the programs' websites. Using PubMed, each resident's number of publications, authorship status, and journal type were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 24 programs were included in the final analysis and the average number of manuscripts was 2.76 ± 4.01. The mean number of publications in otolaryngology journals was 1.03 ± 1.91. CONCLUSIONS: The difference between the investigated average number of publications (2.76) and those published by ChOM (10.4) represent a discrepancy due to the lack of delineation between abstracts, presentations and publications. The reported numbers for research may lead medical students to pursue alternate measures to increase their own research. Some options, such as adding a research year are not universally accessible. A clearer and more detailed approach to reporting research statistics would be beneficial to both applicants and PDs for otolaryngology programs.

PubMed-Indexed Research Productivity of Students Matching at Top Urology Programs: 2017-2020.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the number of PubMed-indexed research projects of medical students matching at top-ranked urology programs as compared to the average publications reported in the Electronic Residency Applicant Service (ERAS). METHODS: Doximity Residency Navigator was used to generate the top 50 residency programs when sorted by reputation. Residents were then found using program websites. PubMed was queried for peer-reviewed publications of incoming interns through post graduate year 3 residents as of February 2020. All PubMed-indexed research was recorded before September 15th of the residents' fourth year of medical school. We recorded the number of publications, first/last author publications, and urology-specific publications. RESULTS: The average number of publications across all 4 years was 2.38 ± 4.19. The average for urology-specific publications was 1.05 ± 3.19 and for first/last author publications was 0.80 ± 1.77. Most matched applicants had at least one PubMed-indexed publication (61.2%) and having over 3 placed them in the 75th percentile. It is uncommon for students to have urology specific or first/last author publications (34.0%, 36.5%). Top 10 programs matched applicants with significantly more research in each of the aforementioned categories and as program reputation declined, so did the publications of the applicants they matched. CONCLUSION: Most research that matched urology applicant's report in ERAS is not PubMed Indexed. Most had at least one PubMed-indexed publication by the time they submitted ERAS and those at top programs had more. It would be helpful to students and faculty advisors if ERAS published research metrics for matched and unmatched applicants separating PubMed-indexed work from posters and presentations.

Mentorship Through Research: A Novel Approach to Increasing Resident and Medical Student Research Competency Through an Institutional Database.

BACKGROUND: We describe a novel research database development project to increase resident and medical student scholarly ability and mentorship skills. We collected data on 3147 facial fractures treated at our institution over a 12-year period. This data was used to publish novel research on multiple types of facial fractures and outcomes. METHODS: We learned about key database aspects that led to its high level of research quality and output volume through over 6 years of database development and expanded research output. A retrospective review was completed to compile the total research produced during this time period. RESULTS: Research resulted in 20 manuscripts, 17 podium presentations, and 11 posters. 16 medical students, 5 residents and 3 faculty members were authors on at least one project. The average number of published manuscripts was 5.17 overall and 2.9, 7.0, and 14.0 for medical students, residents, and faculty, respectively. Four residents matched into fellowship, 7 medical students matched into residency, and one faculty member was promoted academically. CONCLUSIONS: A database focused on a common and under-researched pathology can result in a high volume of novel research output. Additional program benefits include increased scholarly and mentorship ability in engaged residents and medical students.

The Utilization of YouTube as a Resource on Hair Loss Treatments.

INTRODUCTION: To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have evaluated the quality of videos discussing hair loss treatments METHODS: YouTube was searched on December 10, 2019, using the relevance and view count filters for the following search terms: hair loss treatment, baldness, alopecia, male pattern baldness, and female pattern baldness. The DISCERN criterion for assessing consumer health information was used to evaluate each video. A score of 1 indicates a low overall video quality, whereas a 5 indicates a high-quality source of information for patients. The DISCERN treatment assessment is a validated tool to assess the quality of patient information about treatment choices. Two-sample t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to determine significance. RESULTS: We analyzed 90 videos receiving a total of 108,240,496 views with a mean view count of 1,202,672 views per video (Table 1). Pharmaceuticals including minoxidil and finasteride were the most commonly mentioned treatment (30% of videos) followed by nutraceuticals (20%). YouTube influencers (Table 2) represented 37.8% of authors followed by companies/advertisers (15.6%). Seventeen videos (18.9%) included board-certified dermatologists. The mean DS overall was 2.66, and the mean DS for bias was 2.98. DISCUSSION: Our data demonstrate the extensive use of YouTube for hair loss treatment information. While YouTube can be a valuable resource for patients, videos are often biased and can misinform patients. Moreover, the lack of a central review process or governing body to validate claims made in videos can be a safety concern. EBM LEVEL V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

YouTube for Cosmetic Plastic Surgery: An Effective Patient Resource?

BACKGROUND: YouTube is increasingly being utilized as a major educational resource by patients. It is important for plastic surgeons to understand the quality and characteristics of videos that patients are likely to view about procedures of interest. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the videos that patients are most likely to encounter when searching YouTube for the most common cosmetic plastic surgery procedures. METHODS: Based on Google Trends data, the most searched medical and colloquial terms were identified for common cosmetic surgery procedures: "abdominoplasty," "tummy tuck," "breast augmentation," "boob job," "liposuction," "lipo," "mastopexy," "breast lift," "reduction mammoplasty," and "breast reduction." On YouTube, videos were searched by relevance (default) and view count; the top 10 results were collected in each group and rated according to the DISCERN criteria. Each video was assigned an overall and bias DISCERN score (DS). A score of 1 indicates high bias and low overall quality and a score of 5 indicates the opposite. RESULTS: In total, 143 unique videos were identified, which resulted in a mean bias DS of 2.29 and mean overall DS of 2.44. Seventy-two videos included US board-certified plastic surgeons and 58 were classified as patient experience. Videos had 667,373,209 total views and were an average of 4.27 years old. Videos including US board-certified plastic surgeons were of significantly higher quality and showed lower bias than videos without these practitioners (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, YouTube videos showed high bias and low quality. Plastic surgeons should be aware of this popular resource and counsel patients about the bias that is often present. Plastic surgeons and academic plastic surgery organizations should strive to upload high-quality, unbiased videos to provide patients with a more appropriate resource.